From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753202AbbGNCiR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:38:17 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40736 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752722AbbGNCiP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:38:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:38:14 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
        "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@intel.com>,
        Ryan Haasken <haasken@cray.com>,
        Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>,
        Hatice =?iso-8859-1?Q?ERT=DCRK?= <haticeerturk27@gmail.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Supriya Karanth <iskaranth@gmail.com>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>, Bobi Jam <bobijam.xu@intel.com>,
        HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: mgc: no need to compare bool value
Message-ID: <20150714023814.GA11616@kroah.com>
References: <20150623142611.GA5816@goodgumbo.baconseed.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150623142611.GA5816@goodgumbo.baconseed.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+89 (0255b37be491) (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
> function if eof is false or not.

Really?  I like the explicit-ness of the code as it is today, it's more
obvious what is going on, which is the most important thing.

thanks,

greg k-h