On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Add power-domain binding documentation for the NVIDIA PMC driver in > order to support generic power-domains. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter > --- > .../bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-pmc.txt | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-pmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-pmc.txt > index 02c27004d4a8..93357a450576 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-pmc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-pmc.txt > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > NVIDIA Tegra Power Management Controller (PMC) > > +== Power Management Controller Node == > + > The PMC block interacts with an external Power Management Unit. The PMC > mostly controls the entry and exit of the system from different sleep > modes. It provides power-gating controllers for SoC and CPU power-islands. > @@ -68,6 +70,10 @@ Optional properties for hardware-triggered thermal reset (inside 'i2c-thermtrip' > Defaults to 0. Valid values are described in section 12.5.2 > "Pinmux Support" of the Tegra4 Technical Reference Manual. > > +Optional nodes: > +- pm-domains : This node contains a hierarchy of PM domain nodes, which should > + match the power-domains on the Tegra SoC. Perhaps call this simply power-domains to match the property name in consumer nodes? > + > Example: > > / SoC dts including file > @@ -113,3 +119,96 @@ pmc@7000f400 { > }; > ... > }; > + > + > +== PM Domain Nodes == > + > +Each of the PM domain nodes represents a power-domain on the Tegra SoC > +that can be power-gated by the PMC and should be named appropriately. > + > +Required properties: > + - clocks: Must contain an entry for each clock required by > + the PMC for controlling a power-gate. See > + ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details. > + - resets: Must contain an entry for each reset required by > + the PMC for controlling a power-gate. See > + ../reset/reset.txt for details. > + - nvidia,powergate: Integer cell that contains an identifier for the > + PMC power-gate that is associated with the > + power-domain. Please refer to the Tegra TRM for > + more details. I find this really difficult to read. Can we use a more conventional format such as: - clocks: Must contain... ... for details. ? > + - #power-domain-cells: Must be 0. > + > +Optional properties: > + - nvidia,swgroups: Provides details of the software groups that are > + associated with a specific power-domain. The > + software group specifier consists of a phandle > + pointing to the memory controller and a list of > + one or more integer cells for each software group > + associated with the power domain. The length of > + the list of integer cells is specified by > + #nvidia,swgroup-cells. > + - #nvidia,swgroup-cells: Must be 1 or more. See nvidia,swgroups for > + more details. That's not how this usually works. #*-cells properties determine the number of cells required per pair. So I think this should be more along the lines of: - #nvidia,swgroups: A list of software groups associated with a specific power domain. This consists of a list of phandle and SWGROUP ID pairs, where the phandle points to the memory controller node. - #nvidia,swgroup-cells: Must be 1. The single cell in the specifier denotes the ID of the software group. > + > +Example: > + > + pmc@0,7000e400 { > + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-pmc"; > + reg = <0x0 0x7000e400 0x0 0x400>; > + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA124_CLK_PCLK>, <&clk32k_in>; > + clock-names = "pclk", "clk32k_in"; > + > + pm-domains { power-domains would convey more clearly what this is about. > + ... > + > + pd_sor: sor-power-domain { I don't think it's useful to repeat the -power-domain suffix for all these nodes. Thierry