From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53416 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755164AbbGQNPN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:15:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:15:06 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: David =?UTF-8?B?SMOkcmRlbWFu?= Cc: Antti =?UTF-8?B?U2VwcMOkbMOk?= , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] rc: rc-ir-raw: Add scancode encoder callback Message-ID: <20150717101506.1aea8c88@recife.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150713174750.GB3038@hardeman.nu> References: <20150521194034.GB19532@hardeman.nu> <5418c2397b8a8dab54bfbcfe9ed3df1d@hardeman.nu> <3b967113dc16d6edc8d8dd7df9be8b80@hardeman.nu> <20150618182305.577ba0df@recife.lan> <20150629190524.GA29330@hardeman.nu> <20150713174750.GB3038@hardeman.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:47:50 +0200 David Härdeman escreveu: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:05:24PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45:42PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > >>On 2015-06-18 23:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>Em Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:44:54 +0200 > >>>David Härdeman escreveu: > >>>>Mauro....wake up? I hope you're not planning to push the current code > >>>>upstream??? > >>> > >>>What's there are planned to be sent upstream. If you think that something > >>>is not mature enough to be applied, please send a patch reverting it, > >>>with "[PATCH FIXES]" in the subject, clearly explaining why it should be > >>>reverted for me to analyze. Having Antti/James acks on that would help. > >> > >>This thread should already provide you with all the information you need why > >>the patches should be reverted (including Antii saying the patches should be > >>reverted). > >> > >>The current code includes hilarious "features" like producing different > >>results depending on module load order and makes sure we'll be stuck with a > >>bad API. Sending them upstream will look quite foolish... > > > >And now the patches have been submitted and comitted upstream. What's > >your plan? Leave it like this? > > Mauro, I see that you've applied four of my patches...thanks for > that...but the question is still what you plan to do about the patches > that should be reverted....4.2-rc2 was recently released and I'm still > not seeing any action on this while time is running out...? What patches? I'm not seeing any such revert patches on my queue. At least patchwork doesn't show any pending patches from you: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?submitter=96 Nor from James: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?submitter=1270 Nor from Antti: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?submitter=650 Are you sure you submitted any reverse patch? If so, please point the patches you sent for me to review/apply. Thanks, Mauro