From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 6/9] isert: Rename IO functions to more descriptive names Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:53:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20150726155304.GA32464@infradead.org> References: <20150724161331.25617.8475.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <20150724161848.25617.26092.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <55B4B190.7070305@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20150726104328.GB18944@infradead.org> <55B4BDE3.8040801@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B4BDE3.8040801@dev.mellanox.co.il> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Steve Wise , dledford@redhat.com, infinipath@intel.com, sagig@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, roid@mellanox.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, eli@mellanox.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 02:00:51PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On the wire iser sends a single rkey, but the target is allowed to > transfer the data however it wants to. So you're trying to get above the limit of a single RDMA READ, not above the limit for memory registration in the initiator? In that case your explanation makes sense, that's just not what I expected to be the limiting factor.