From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752566AbbG1Rl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:41:59 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180]:34110 "EHLO mail-yk0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbbG1Rl5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:41:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:41:54 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Borislav Petkov , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/14] kthread_worker: Add set_kthread_worker_scheduler*() Message-ID: <20150728174154.GG5322@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1438094371-8326-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1438094371-8326-15-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438094371-8326-15-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:39:31PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > +/** > + * set_kthread_worker_scheduler - change the scheduling policy and/or RT > + * priority of a kthread worker. > + * @worker: target kthread_worker > + * @policy: new policy > + * @sched_priority: new RT priority > + * > + * Return: 0 on success. An error code otherwise. > + */ > +int set_kthread_worker_scheduler(struct kthread_worker *worker, > + int policy, int sched_priority) > +{ > + return __set_kthread_worker_scheduler(worker, policy, sched_priority, > + true); > +} Ditto. I don't get why we would want these thin wrappers. Thanks. -- tejun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/14] kthread_worker: Add set_kthread_worker_scheduler*() Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:41:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20150728174154.GG5322@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1438094371-8326-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1438094371-8326-15-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438094371-8326-15-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Borislav Petkov , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:39:31PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > +/** > + * set_kthread_worker_scheduler - change the scheduling policy and/or RT > + * priority of a kthread worker. > + * @worker: target kthread_worker > + * @policy: new policy > + * @sched_priority: new RT priority > + * > + * Return: 0 on success. An error code otherwise. > + */ > +int set_kthread_worker_scheduler(struct kthread_worker *worker, > + int policy, int sched_priority) > +{ > + return __set_kthread_worker_scheduler(worker, policy, sched_priority, > + true); > +} Ditto. I don't get why we would want these thin wrappers. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org