On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, NeilBrown wrote:

> > Claws-mail doesn't make it easy to reply to attachments - you have to 
> > use the clumsy "copy/paste/add '>'" that you describe. However asserting 
> > that other people should follow a particular work flow because my tools 
> > aren't very good does not sound like a convincing argument to me. If my 
> > tools don't work with a workflow that is prima-facie reasonable, then it 
> > is my tools that are at fault and I should fix them, not ask someone 
> > else to change their workflow.

> Just in case anyone is collecting data-points from this discussion, pine 
> doesn't make it really easy to include attachment text in-line in reply 
> either.

mutt is a bit fun here - it only works if the attachment has a text MIME
type which a lot of the systems that force people to attach patches seem
to struggle with.