On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2015-09-18 11:30, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:24:00PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote: > >> On 2015-09-07 11:14 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>> Full jenkins build test takes over 3 days (depending on sstate reuse, > >>> one MACHINE can take more than 24 hours), so if I add them to > >>> master-next after it's merged to oe-core it will take 3-6 days to > >>> build-test them (6 days if they are sent just after current queue is > >>> sent for build). > >> > >> Hi Martin, > > > > Hi Randy, > > > >> Replying privately but you can add the list back in your > >> reply if you like. > > > > OK, adding both MLs > > > >> I never build all of meta-oe but a day seems like a long time. > >> On a 3-4 year old 24 core system, with 64 GB RAM and > >> 2 large disks, I build oe-core + a whitelist of meta-oe + misc layers in > >> 5 hours using 18.3 of the 24 cores on average. > >> What are the specs of your build machine? > > > > It's one of VMs running on box donated by HP to webos-ports project. It > > has access to 8 E5-2630L 0 @ 2.00GHz cores (from IIRC 24) and slow IO > > which we try to compensate a bit by using tmpfs for TMPDIR, VM has 80G > > RAM, so I'm using 72G for tmpfs. > > > > Tom: please fill-in the gaps, I don't know any details about the real HW > > it's running on. > > > > The same machine is also running some webos-ports builds sometimes. > > > > BUT be aware that my world build is much bigger than what you're > > probably building and changes in oe-core almost always ensure very low > > sstate reuse. > > > > e.g. last build with only small oe-core upgrade since previous build: > > NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 33283 tasks of which 5252 didn't need to be rerun and 33 failed. > > NOTE: Build completion summary: > > NOTE: do_populate_sysroot: 21% sstate reuse (485 setscene, 1750 scratch) > > NOTE: do_package_qa: 12% sstate reuse (262 setscene, 1760 scratch) > > NOTE: do_package: 4% sstate reuse (76 setscene, 1750 scratch) > > NOTE: do_packagedata: 13% sstate reuse (281 setscene, 1750 scratch) > > NOTE: do_package_write_ipk: 12% sstate reuse (262 setscene, 1756 scratch) > > NOTE: do_populate_lic: 22% sstate reuse (521 setscene, 1806 scratch) > > (slightly off topic): How did you get this report? inherit buildstats-summary > > real 1485m40.070s > > user 4166m49.125s > > sys 2825m50.068s > > > > BTW: you can see all this information in the world logs I'm sending to MLs > > (but not all the builds make it to ML report). > > > >> A decent build box these days has 32+ cores, 64+ GB RAM and > >> and SSD or RAID disk filesystem. The costs of such a system > >> are significant but worth it given the number of people's time > >> involved in meta-oe. > > > > That's true, but I have to do with what I have available :). > > > >> Also, it would be nice if OE had a few such machines each > >> working on builds for a MACHINE to reduce your turn-around > >> to more like a day or so. :) > > > > Yes, it would be nice, I'm trying to get Tom King to set another VM like > > this in another location (another HP donated server), hopefully he will > > finish it soon. > > > > It's all hosted together with OE infrastructure, bandwidth is limited, but > > all I need for these builds is to fetch sources and upload the logs, there > > are no package feeds or sstate from these builds usable outside, but now it > > rsync the downloaded sources to sources.openembedded.org > > > > If you know about some idling build servers, I would like to give them > > something to do :). > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com