From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965154AbbI2OSV (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:18:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:38377 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965093AbbI2OSM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:18:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:18:07 +0100 From: Matt Fleming To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Matt Fleming , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Borislav Petkov , Leif Lindholm , Peter Jones , James Bottomley , Matthew Garrett , Dave Young , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Denys Vlasenko , Brian Gerst , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime Message-ID: <20150929141807.GB4401@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1443218539-7610-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <1443218539-7610-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150926055643.GA25877@gmail.com> <20150926134329.GA3144@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150927070355.GB26125@gmail.com> <20150928082245.GA28796@gmail.com> <20150929091230.GA2023@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Sep, at 12:41:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > OK, fair enough. I agree that setting the flag for 32-bit would be > semantically correct. I will leave it to Matt to comment whether it is > reasonable in terms of changes to other parts of the code. It should be pretty minimal. Let me take a swing at the patch. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:18:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20150929141807.GB4401@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1443218539-7610-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <1443218539-7610-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150926055643.GA25877@gmail.com> <20150926134329.GA3144@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150927070355.GB26125@gmail.com> <20150928082245.GA28796@gmail.com> <20150929091230.GA2023@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Matt Fleming , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Borislav Petkov , Leif Lindholm , Peter Jones , James Bottomley , Matthew Garrett , Dave Young , "stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Denys Vlasenko , Brian Gerst , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Sep, at 12:41:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > OK, fair enough. I agree that setting the flag for 32-bit would be > semantically correct. I will leave it to Matt to comment whether it is > reasonable in terms of changes to other parts of the code. It should be pretty minimal. Let me take a swing at the patch. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center