From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 628 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bilbo; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:45:00 AEST Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com (sender163-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19A21A0024 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:45:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (108-215-4-10.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.215.4.10]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1443537893194704.6000906531823; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:44:51 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Brad Bishop Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: BSP layers Message-ID: <20150929144451.GF14293@asimov.ibm.com> References: <722865DA-D254-4972-9020-E6D01F95EC60@bwbmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kR3zbvD4cgoYnS/6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <722865DA-D254-4972-9020-E6D01F95EC60@bwbmail.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:45:01 -0000 --kR3zbvD4cgoYnS/6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:47:59PM -0400, Brad Bishop wrote: > I have a couple new layer repositories: >=20 > https://github.com/bradbishop/meta-aspeed > https://github.com/bradbishop/meta-openpower >=20 > Appreciate any feedback. >=20 > Thx! - brad >=20 Brad, I noticed in the layer.conf files we are manually assigning priority. Do we want to allow the automatic assignment or is there some guidelines on what the priority should be? Seems that you have: * BMC Hardware Layer - 7 * Host Machine Class - 8 * Host Machine Specific - 9 * OEM Machine Enhancment - 10 (not there, but imagined by me). Based on the conference call we had last week, I think we should go ahead and make github.com/openbmc repositories for these two you have. I can create that if you want. What is your proposal for where these repositories live in openbmc/openbmc? meta-openbmc-bsp for meta-aspeed? I'm unsure if meta-openpower belongs under a meta-openbmc-machines or meta-phosphor/meta-machines? --=20 Patrick Williams --kR3zbvD4cgoYnS/6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWCqPjAAoJEKsDR8wtAMEZHU4P/35Fi0zBBiNSCpLehSFX+PXY UZXdzoegndOAnA30lReNvOnKzgN95GLfPpBK5RafrNR5jbljRxazbZtAGMe0Uu0d qopwGAW2FMTCS94thwpcocTFPD7rB9cfSTM4WFa4wgI3+DUn8NF1nkf1s2PytuiN uhsf9FRSMV5Wl+CNjwIXmlLnLteVR67N7UiIXNEcRFVMtgD5WO5GmE7Ol+WrXXmY ZxZWq5Z2fwaIzJCOeDpO1ekDcB6z5i/vq+oNXwq9K4JoXWBY8Xr8xUBHeBDHg5wh xYzKpUdcJLGbqV4Vf2ijEzNoryplchhAP8Cznnca3z9tqH/Js8c/EzJ8beEUogcD C8hq9mYGCphHaaafVAhTjkNhA7+cI/5SQSYXVJA4AXLk2oYat2sDpOq16kiZZ5xv UnT5vME/fyE/KdCVvsonqnOkswIeDrqkUWM9Npb+lGTg1cjjmsxpmUs1YxYteZTa zy/hX0awsACMigJa9w4iOzw4AnCJGSu/krRJiG8PQjHnqVWIUzCfXXMGwCbea8a5 b07z00zkR5A2weLjtYxWdz+fou4W2wgypXmyY2CfzWp5SRaCHboiaVUJime+DXU+ Qy/fh1JI/4h9bf7GQHfAKrzBgSvCh0mXBSVe59dkNU35pvfVy4hAx2ZauB0HSkQm NGQlYlq74H6NJzUSj0nH =Uu99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kR3zbvD4cgoYnS/6--