From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752000AbbJLRzL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:55:11 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:36047 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751448AbbJLRzJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:55:09 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:55:01 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"
Message-ID: <20151012175459.GD1113@lerouge>
References: <1444663283-30068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
 <20151012153202.GB3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20151012162001.GA32228@lerouge>
 <20151012165353.GF3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <561BE5FC.1020300@ezchip.com>
 <20151012174238.GA1113@lerouge>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1510121243300.32239@east.gentwo.org>
 <20151012175208.GG3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151012175208.GG3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:52:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:45:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 
> > > But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz
> > > and isolcpus I think we can.
> > 
> > Could we also add the rcu settings?
> 
> I thought that I already had.  What am I still missing?
> 
> > > task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name.
> > 
> > no_os_cpus?
> > 
> > os_free_cpus?
> 
> os_jitter_free_cpus?
> 
> clean_cpus?
> 
> quiet_cpus?
> 
> I have no problem with any of the names proposed thus far, but obviously
> could not resist the urge to propose a few more.

I moved forward quite slowly with nohz full over the years but at least I'm proud
that this subsystem introduced some of the most interesting naming challenges!