From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmOyg-0004Pn-6y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:32:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmOya-00009c-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:32:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmOya-000096-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:32:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:32:23 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20151014163223.GU1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> References: <1443389342-2186-1-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <1443389342-2186-4-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <20151001090203.6cf5af1a@nial.brq.redhat.com> <560CEE63.9030909@redhat.com> <20151001133350.5b2c65cc@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20151010040016.GA11819@GLSMBP.INI.CMU.EDU> <20151013191003.GQ1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20151014001736-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20151013224300.GT1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20151014075957-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151014075957-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: pc: add fw_cfg device node to ssdt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, matt.fleming@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, "Gabriel L. Somlo" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org, kevin@koconnor.net, kraxel@redhat.com, zhaoshenglong@huawei.com, Igor Mammedov , markmb@redhat.com, Laszlo Ersek , rth@twiddle.net On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:06:36AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 07:43:00PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:18:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:10:03PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > > One of the things that may break if guest-visible bits of the machine > > > > change is Windows license activation, but the rules Windows use to > > > > trigger reactivation aren't very clear. > > > > > > They are easy to find on the internet. > > > > I couldn't find them[1]. If you have a pointer to a clear description of > > the rules for all Windows versions, I would love to see it. > > > The detailed info is not hard to find: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Product_Activation > links to: > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457054.aspx Thanks. Do you know if there's public information for other Windows versions, or only Windows XP? -- Eduardo