From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xfrm: Fix unaligned access in xfrm_notify_sa() for DELSA Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20151021.061043.723408372175418569.davem@davemloft.net> References: <65f37efeff5af105c89493dda4f38c61e4cd495f.1445286755.git.sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> <20151021065704.GM7701@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, dhowells@redhat.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, David.Woodhouse@intel.com To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:43737 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753767AbbJUMyU (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:54:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151021065704.GM7701@secunet.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Steffen Klassert Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:57:04 +0200 > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:23:29PM -0400, Sowmini Varadhan wrote: >> On sparc, deleting established SAs (e.g., by restarting ipsec >> at the peer) results in unaligned access messages via >> xfrm_del_sa -> km_state_notify -> xfrm_send_state_notify(). >> Use an aligned pointer to xfrm_usersa_info for this case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan >> --- >> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c >> index a8de9e3..158ef4a 100644 >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c >> @@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ static int xfrm_notify_sa(struct xfrm_state *x, const struct km_event *c) >> if (attr == NULL) >> goto out_free_skb; >> >> - p = nla_data(attr); >> + p = PTR_ALIGN(nla_data(attr), __alignof__(*p)); > > Hm, this breaks userspace notifications on 64-bit systems. > Userspace expects this to be aligned to 4, with your patch > it is aligned to 8 on 64-bit. That's correct, netlink attributes are fundamentally only 4 byte aligned and this cannot be changed. nla_data() is exactly where the attribute must be placed, aligned or not. The only workaround is, when designing netlink attributes. Various netlink libraries have workarounds for accessing, for example, 64-bit stats which are going to be unaligned in netlink messages.