From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753779AbbJUIG4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:06:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:37809 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752796AbbJUIGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:06:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:06:45 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Brendan Gregg , LKML , Adrian Hunter , Borislav Petkov , Chandler Carruth , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Stephane Eranian , Wang Nan Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] perf callchain: Switch default to 'graph,0.5,caller' Message-ID: <20151021080645.GA9318@gmail.com> References: <1444079018-31421-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <1444079018-31421-14-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <20151009215626.GM14409@kernel.org> <20151009222504.GN14409@kernel.org> <20151020120033.GB5119@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151020120033.GB5119@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Indeed, finding a default that is deemed adequate for most people is, ho-hum, > difficult 8-) > > Ingo, what do you think? So I think the new default is a lot more intuitive, because it starts with a high level top-down 'overview' kind of output, allowing one to drill down to the details. That's what most other tools do as well by default, and people migrating to perf found it pretty confusing that we do a bottom-up kind of callgraph. To people using perf for the first time it does not matter nearly as much, but intuitiveness is still a factor. The new default requires good call-chains and good symbol resolution to be maximally effective, but we want perfect callchains and symbols in any case, right? Thanks, Ingo