From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZotrO-0001h9-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:55:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZotrN-00037S-BS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:55:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:55:09 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20151021135509.GH13408@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1443130823-10723-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <5626A198.8040208@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5626A198.8040208@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] transactions: add transaction-wide property List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow Cc: famz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thanks for summarizing the discussion! If you are taking over Fam's series, please squash in your patches to make review easier. Maybe the names can be improved: "allow-partial" is not self-explanatory. "sync-cancel" is misleading since successful completion is affected too, not just failure/cancel (jobs wait for each other before reporting successful completion). How about "transactional-completion" or "group-completion": "none"/"all"? Stefan