From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51C27CBF for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:28:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40938F8033 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:28:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qFq4vRCSHHSTrux0 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:28:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:27:58 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/51] xfs_io: support reflink and dedupe of file ranges Message-ID: <20151110062758.GG3255@birch.djwong.org> References: <20151007050513.1504.28089.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151007050533.1504.66249.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151014053656.GJ10397@birch.djwong.org> <20151109075438.GA17974@infradead.org> <20151109183311.GA3255@birch.djwong.org> <20151109185724.GB2224@birch.djwong.org> <20151109213520.GB14311@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151109213520.GB14311@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:35:20AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:57:24AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:33:12AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Any reason why the dedup command is called 'dedupe'? Is this a revenge > > > > for the missing 'e' in the creat syscall? :) > > > > > > Heh, sure! :) > > > > > > I stuck on the 'e' because the btrfs tool is 'duperemove', not 'dupremove'. > > > > > > (I have no preference either way.) > > > > > > > Either way it would be good to get this support in ASAP so we can have > > > > the command ready for xfstests and we can merge the test. They are > > > > useful for btrfs and NFS already, so I'd love to fast track them. > > > > Oh. Heh. I forgot that Dave merged the v1 patch into for-next after I'd posted > > the v2 patch. So ... I thought I'd convinced him to revert the v1 patch and > > stuff in the v2 patch, but that hasn't shown up on kernel.org. > > > > -ETOOMANYPATCHES :( > > Need to push it out - I have an updated branch here, just been > delayed in testing and pushing out progs-4.3-rc2. Ok, thanks, I'll rebase and give the tests a spin in the morning. --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs