From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net, mhocko@kernel.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire()
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111121232.GN17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151111093939.GA6314@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:39:40PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Just be curious, should spin_unlock_wait() semantically be an ACQUIRE?
I did wonder the same thing, it would simplify a number of things if
this were so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-02 13:29 [PATCH 0/4] scheduler ordering bits Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Better document the try_to_wake_up() barriers Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 0:09 ` Byungchul Park
2015-12-04 0:58 ` Byungchul Park
2015-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 20:27 ` Paul Turner
2015-11-02 20:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 22:09 ` Paul Turner
2015-11-02 22:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-20 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-20 14:08 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-20 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-20 14:21 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-20 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Fix a race in try_to_wake_up() vs schedule() Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire() Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 17:43 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-03 1:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-03 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-02 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-02 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-02 18:37 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-02 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-02 19:57 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-02 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-03 1:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-03 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-04 3:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-04 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-04 12:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-02 20:36 ` David Howells
2015-11-02 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-03 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-03 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 9:39 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-11 10:34 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-11 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-12 13:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-11 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-11-11 19:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-11 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-12 7:14 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-12 15:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-12 14:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-12 14:49 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-12 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-12 21:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-12 15:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-12 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-12 15:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-12 21:25 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 15:18 ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-12 18:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-12 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-12 19:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-11-12 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-12 21:33 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-16 13:58 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-12 22:09 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-16 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-16 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-16 16:24 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-16 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-16 16:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-16 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-16 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-17 11:51 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-18 11:25 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-19 18:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-20 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151111121232.GN17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.