From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:54440 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754642AbbKMLhW (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:37:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:37:16 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Patrick Boettcher Cc: Alec Leamas , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20151113093716.17157745@recife.lan> In-Reply-To: <20151113105431.71030921@dibcom294.coe.adi.dibcom.com> References: <5644AD42.4060904@users.sourceforge.net> <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> <20151113105431.71030921@dibcom294.coe.adi.dibcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:54:31 +0100 Patrick Boettcher escreveu: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:41:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > > Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? > > > > No, because it doesn't make easy for people to reply with comments. > > Except if you are using claws. With which you can select text in a text > attachment and click the reply button and it will create a response > with the selected text in the message body. But only this part, not the > rest of the message. Yes, I use such feature when needed, but then I need to do two "replies" and merge on a single reply email, with kinda sucks and spends me more time. So, I tend to postpone those patches, if I am in a hurry. However, lots of developers use mutt, with doesn't have such option. Regards, Mauro