From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752769AbbKPRnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:43:32 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60354 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265AbbKPRna (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:43:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:43:21 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Daniel Stone Cc: Liviu Dudau , linux-rockchip , Daniel Vetter , LKML , dri-devel , LAKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. Message-ID: <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20151116162241.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116164907.GA4158@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 > > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply > > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting > > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that > > kind of additional work? Thanks. > > His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. > You should probably look into fixing your MUA. No. Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an 80 column screen. Wrapping at 80+ characters is against proper net etiquette. Same applies to GIT commits: wrap at around 72 characters to allow them to be readable on an 80 column display. Linus will hate you if you don't. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:43:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20151116162241.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116164907.GA4158@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Daniel Stone Cc: Daniel Vetter , Liviu Dudau , LKML , dri-devel , linux-rockchip , LAKML List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org T24gTW9uLCBOb3YgMTYsIDIwMTUgYXQgMDU6MzI6MDVQTSArMDAwMCwgRGFuaWVsIFN0b25lIHdy b3RlOgo+IE9uIDE2IE5vdmVtYmVyIDIwMTUgYXQgMTc6MjIsIFJ1c3NlbGwgS2luZyAtIEFSTSBM aW51eAo+IDxsaW51eEBhcm0ubGludXgub3JnLnVrPiB3cm90ZToKPiA+IFBsZWFzZSBzZW5zaWJs eSB3cmFwIHlvdXIgbWVzc2FnZXMuICBZb3VyIGxpbmVzIGFyZSBsb25nZXIgdGhhbiA4MAo+ID4g Y2hhcmFjdGVycyB3aGljaCBtYWtlcyBpdCBleGNlZWRpbmdseSBkaWZmaWN1bHQgZm9yIHNvbWUg cGVvcGxlIHRvIHJlcGx5Cj4gPiB0byB5b3VyIHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5 IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5Cj4gPiB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZl cnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkKPiA+IHZlcnkg dmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZl cnkgdmVyeQo+ID4gdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkg dmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5Cj4gPiB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVy eSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IHZlcnkKPiA+IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2 ZXJ5IHZlcnkgdmVyeSB2ZXJ5IGxvbmcgbGluZXMgd2l0aG91dCBmaXJzdCByZWZvcm1hdHRpbmcK PiA+IHRoZW0gbWFudWFsbHkgLSBhbmQgd2h5IHNob3VsZCB0aGV5IGJvdGhlciB0byByZXBseSBp ZiB0aGV5IGhhdmUgdGhhdAo+ID4ga2luZCBvZiBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIHdvcms/ICBUaGFua3MuCj4g Cj4gSGlzIGxpbmVzIGFyZSB3cmFwcGVkIG1vc3RseSBhdCA4MCwgYnV0IHNvbWV0aW1lcyBhdCA4 NiwgY2hhcmFjdGVycy4KPiBZb3Ugc2hvdWxkIHByb2JhYmx5IGxvb2sgaW50byBmaXhpbmcgeW91 ciBNVUEuCgpOby4KClN0YW5kYXJkIG5ldCBldGlxdWV0dGUgaXMgdGhhdCBlbWFpbCBzaG91bGQg YmUgd3JhcHBlZCBhcm91bmQgNzIKY2hhcmFjdGVycyB0byBnaXZlIHNwYWNlIGZvciByZXBseSBp bmRlbnRhdGlvbiB0byByZW1haW4gcmVhZGFibGUKb24gYW4gODAgY29sdW1uIHNjcmVlbi4gTW9z dCBvZiBteSBlbWFpbCByZXBsaWVzIGFyZSB3cml0dGVuIG9uIGFuCjgwIGNvbHVtbiBzY3JlZW4u CgpXcmFwcGluZyBhdCA4MCsgY2hhcmFjdGVycyBpcyBhZ2FpbnN0IHByb3BlciBuZXQgZXRpcXVl dHRlLgoKU2FtZSBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIEdJVCBjb21taXRzOiB3cmFwIGF0IGFyb3VuZCA3MiBjaGFy YWN0ZXJzIHRvIGFsbG93CnRoZW0gdG8gYmUgcmVhZGFibGUgb24gYW4gODAgY29sdW1uIGRpc3Bs YXkuICBMaW51cyB3aWxsIGhhdGUgeW91CmlmIHlvdSBkb24ndC4KCi0tIApGVFRDIGJyb2FkYmFu ZCBmb3IgMC44bWlsZSBsaW5lOiBjdXJyZW50bHkgYXQgOS42TWJwcyBkb3duIDQwMGticHMgdXAK YWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHNwZWVkdGVzdC5uZXQuCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmRyaS1kZXZlbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKZHJpLWRldmVsQGxpc3Rz LmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:43:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. In-Reply-To: References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20151116162241.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116164907.GA4158@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 > > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply > > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting > > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that > > kind of additional work? Thanks. > > His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. > You should probably look into fixing your MUA. No. Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an 80 column screen. Wrapping at 80+ characters is against proper net etiquette. Same applies to GIT commits: wrap at around 72 characters to allow them to be readable on an 80 column display. Linus will hate you if you don't. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.