From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752610AbbKQMU2 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:20:28 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:45134 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751350AbbKQMU0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:20:26 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:20:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, lizefan@huawei.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, pi3orama@163.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue
Message-ID: <20151117122022.GE22729@kernel.org>
References: <1447675815-166222-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
 <1447675815-166222-13-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
 <20151117012924.GA22729@kernel.org>
 <564AAF4D.5080902@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <564AAF4D.5080902@huawei.com>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:38:37PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> On 2015/11/17 9:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >How about:
> >
> >   # perf test -v BPF
> >   37: Test BPF filter:
> >   37.1: test a						       : Ok
> >   37.2: test b						       : Ok
> >   37.3: Test BPF prologue generation			       : Ok
> >   37.4: Another...                                             : Ok
> >   37: Test BPF filter					       : Ok
> >   #

> I think what you want is to report state of subtests *without* -v?
 
> That would be nice but changing of perf testing infrastructure is required
> because there's no "sub-test" before, and we both agree that testcase
> should be silent without '-v', so we need a way to output them in
> builtin-test.c.
 
> Let me try it but I think it should not be a blocking problem.

Thanks for looking into this,

- Arnaldo