From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1163157AbbKTTlr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:41:47 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:49083 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751699AbbKTTlp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:41:45 -0500
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:41:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, mhocko@kernel.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees
Message-ID: <20151120194136.GX3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20151102132901.157178466@infradead.org>
 <20151102134940.883198067@infradead.org>
 <CAPM31RJASoWP_M0oT_z-j35BYuwOa7xFCyBCykqDQzio0H-RSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151120100230.GA17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20151120140850.GA19693@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
 <20151120141812.GF17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20151120142111.GB19693@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151120142111.GB19693@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:11PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Yes, exactly that. Would an unadorned 2 be clearer?
> 
> How about "the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_acquire)"?

Sure, that works. Thanks