From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: memory registration updates Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:16:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20151123141650.GA11116@lst.de> References: <1448214409-7729-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <5652D66E.5070600@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5652D66E.5070600-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Christoph Hellwig , dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:03:42AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Christoph, > >> This series removes huge chunks of code related to old memory >> registration methods that we don't use anymore, and then simplifies the >> current memory registration API > > Let's split out patches 10,11 from this set because these patches are > logically completely different from the rest of the series which is a > cleanup by nature. > > I suggest you send out patches 10,11 as a separate RFC series. I send 1-9 out separately earlier :) The other two sit on top of them and they are prep patches in a sense as they remove a lot of users of struct ib_mr that i don't have to modify in patches 10 and 11. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html