From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com (sender163-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 967CA1A029F for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:05:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (32.97.110.52 [32.97.110.52]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1448309120265810.4645372321249; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:05:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:05:18 -0600 From: Patrick Williams To: Stewart Smith Cc: Joel Stanley , OpenBMC Maillist , OpenBMC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH phosphor-host-ipmid] Initial autotools support Message-ID: <20151123200347.GF21764@asimov.pw-on-the.net> References: <1447902029-2805-1-git-send-email-openbmc-patches@stwcx.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m1UC1K4AOz1Ywdkx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-ZohoMail: Ss SS_10 UW1 CHF_KNW_WHT_EXT SGR4_1_19105_2 X-ZohoMail-Owner: <20151123200347.GF21764@asimov.pw-on-the.net>+zmo_0_ X-ZohoMail-Sender: 32.97.110.52 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:05:27 -0000 --m1UC1K4AOz1Ywdkx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > There's also the odd thing at the moment for host-ipmid where there's a > shared library that depends on symbols in the binary The shared libraries are plugins for host-ipmid. We happen to be providing a set of common plugins but those can be overridden by a particular machine. We also provide a set of openpower specific plugins for the parts of IPMI that are not specified (OEM commands) and those are in another package. We should have a discussion on the call about autotools vs (...). The US side of the team has zero experience with autotools and so it was easier to just write some simple makefiles to get started. I don't consider autotools to be the "defacto standard" since cmake is also pretty popular. --=20 Patrick Williams --m1UC1K4AOz1Ywdkx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWU3EjAAoJEKsDR8wtAMEZuAMP/iXpeJZyTon/jWoQB+B3T7sl k4l/7DW1ohvwOMMEP+16pSxS8tvMPZUJE+Rrfr/fxqsaP+pmVCon8Sv0QQNzKcvY w6jkdw48XTnIbdc9Mmi60KNIe1HyF/WZcu5Gkwtt1sZT8NFE4tF/5/n552y+L9Gn YJOFpZ891EGOK52AaE4tYfEnUXRuVzvF3lacZ7x16T6dbcJMvIQHKKAY1b18Gok+ ywV6GWYOHUAUDhQlvJSIv7Hpxmc0UtIq4StDMzzxTEryld5/A/E9DoZL2yBUGIFe b25IJBMlXQkGV1EG9hA7TxQ/Y6dAH7I+oVTE8VI4wLNkuTeHTl7/gb2tRxHptD33 ZdNGEYoS6ylf+4I4xcC3Qf0kISXBeexUoOuiD0th0scxleQ308XKxvOnuVDbvykN qNdjZHQx9+KFxEurct8trQv1imbkvHA9BHlvC+9f88FmPMKAEj6MGa6xmP6MPzEl C7Hs9mVLmPNaZzm+uO3k5W3z3XhA7IS6tnMlpEJ6Ef7N0gcI6wMXNMp6SnZ3A9io 2Vz0ZB0yvvj2lZj4VtnKOi2XUALyDPUQAv58VXI2SgQZySpTVHvyL0goF+9HXeS4 Vm5DXYuNvEcjLSm4pJ0Agp3TfE4vxtzRz34ThArvgVK/0tc6CdUW0yg3fXjZJplQ 991c8ZD3TVANNij7JNo5 =LqpX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m1UC1K4AOz1Ywdkx--