From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 28/50] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_{add,remove}_pci_devices() Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:08:21 +1100 Message-ID: <20151123230821.GD5375@gwshan> References: <1446642770-4681-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1446642770-4681-29-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <564BE5BA.30907@ozlabs.ru> Reply-To: Gavin Shan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564BE5BA.30907@ozlabs.ru> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhelgaas@google.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, robherring2@gmail.com, panto@antoniou-consulting.com, frowand.list@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 01:43:06PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>This renames pcibios_{add,remove}_pci_devices() to avoid conflicts >>with names of the weak functions in PCI subsystem, which have the >>prefix "pcibios". No logical changes introduced. > > >As you mentioned before, the patchset is organized as "code refactoring, >IO/M32/M64, DMA, PE allocation/releaseing". This patch fits into the >refactoring category so it goes to the beginning of the series :) > I don't think so. As said in PATCH[00/50], this patchset consists of 3 separate parts: PowerNV PCI rework; Using PCI slot; Hotplug driver; this patch is one of the second part. So I don't think it needs to be move to the beginning of the series. Thanks, Gavin