From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754023AbbK0Hjk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 02:39:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:37267 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751304AbbK0Hjh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 02:39:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:39:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Seth Jennings Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Anvin , Daniel J Blueman , Yinghai Lu , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size() Message-ID: <20151127073932.GB6234@gmail.com> References: <1448591809-10369-1-git-send-email-sjennings@variantweb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1448591809-10369-1-git-send-email-sjennings@variantweb.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Seth Jennings wrote: > v2: > remove local bz variable (Ingo) and debug message since, if > the 2GB message doesn't print, there is only one possible > block size. I'd not remove the info message, it would print the memory block size regardless of memory size. Yes, one could decode the 'no message' case as 'the kernel used the default value' - but that's very version dependent and obscure in any case. Please keep the debug message in both code paths, like the original code had it. But, on a second thought, I'd definitely harmonize the messages, instead of: > pr_info("Using 2GB memory block size for large-memory system\n"); > printk(KERN_DEBUG "memory block size : %ldMB\n", bz >> 20); I'd print: > pr_info("x86/mm: Memory block size: 2GB, large-memory system\n"); > pr_info("x86/mm: Memory block size: %ldMB\n", bz >> 20); Also note how I changed both printouts to pr_info(), so that we have the memory block size information printed unconditionally. (And btw., doing this printout means that we should keep the 'bz' local variable.) Thanks, Ingo