From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: suppress too verbose messages in tcp_send_ack() Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:06:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20151130.110607.1409128209032271059.davem@redhat.com> References: <1448488250.24696.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33523 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751652AbbK3QGI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:06:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1448488250.24696.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:50:50 -0800 > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 7f89e4ba18d1..ead514332ae8 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static inline int sk_memalloc_socks(void) > > static inline gfp_t sk_gfp_atomic(const struct sock *sk, gfp_t gfp_mask) > { > - return GFP_ATOMIC | (sk->sk_allocation & __GFP_MEMALLOC); > + return gfp_mask | (sk->sk_allocation & __GFP_MEMALLOC); > } > > static inline void sk_acceptq_removed(struct sock *sk) Eric, please rename this to "sk_gfp_mask()" or "sk_gfp_flags()" or something like that since it doesn't unconditionally use GFP_ATOMIC any more. Otherwise I'm %100 fine with this change. Thank you.