All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI / PM: tune down RPM suspend error message with EBUSY and EAGAIN retval
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:07:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130180702.GB29242@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448699664-4178-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

Hi Imre,

> PCI / PM: tune down RPM suspend error message with EBUSY and EAGAIN retval

Please capitalize the first word, e.g., "Tune ..."

Maybe "Tune down non-fatal runtime suspend error messages" would be
more to the point.  Or maybe "retryable," since it sounds like that's
what's supposed to happen.


On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> The runtime PM core doesn't treat EBUSY and EAGAIN retvals from the driver
> suspend hooks as errors, but they still show up as errors in dmesg. Tune
> them down.

I looked briefly for the place in the runtime PM core where we handle
EBUSY and EAGAIN specially, but I didn't find it.  A pointer would be
helpful.

> One problem caused by this was noticed by Daniel: the i915 driver
> returns EAGAIN to signal a temporary failure to suspend and as a request
> towards the RPM core for scheduling a suspend again. This is a normal
> event, but the resulting error message flags a breakage during the
> driver's automated testing which parses dmesg and picks up the error.
> 
> v2:
> - fix compile breake when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n (0-day builder)
> v3:
> - instead of modifying the suspend_report_result() helper to disinguish
>   between the runtime and system suspend case, inline the error
>   printing, it's not used anywhere else (Rafael)
> v4:
> - don't refer to log levels as flags in code comment (Rafael)
> - use pr_debug(), pr_err() instead of the corresponding printk() (Rafael)

The version history is very useful during development but not after
merging, so I prefer it to go after the "---" marker so it doesn't get
included in the permanent changelog.

> Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92992
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 4446fcb..32a9947 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -1146,9 +1146,21 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	pci_dev->state_saved = false;
>  	pci_dev->no_d3cold = false;
>  	error = pm->runtime_suspend(dev);
> -	suspend_report_result(pm->runtime_suspend, error);
> -	if (error)
> +	if (error) {
> +		/*
> +		 * -EBUSY and -EAGAIN is used to request the runtime PM core
> +		 * to schedule a new suspend, so log the event only with debug
> +		 * log level.
> +		 */
> +		if (error == -EBUSY || error == -EAGAIN)
> +			pr_debug("%s(): %pF returns %d\n", __func__,
> +				 pm->runtime_suspend, error);
> +		else
> +			pr_err("%s(): %pF returns %d\n", __func__,
> +			       pm->runtime_suspend, error);

This looks fine to me in principle.

We have the device pointer, so please use dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) and
dev_err().  If you're OK with changing the semantics so the debug
message is only emitted when dynamically enabled, you could use
dev_dbg().

I don't know what a user is supposed to do with a message like:

  pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): ata_port_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x200 returns -12

It feels a little bit ... internal.  Using dev_err() will help anchor
it to a specific device.  It's not related to a specific PC in the
function, so maybe use %pf instead of %pF to get rid of the function
offset and size.  And the message doesn't say anything about what the
return code *means*; maybe something like:

  ata_piix 0000:00:14.0: can't suspend now (ata_port_runtime_suspend returned -11)
  ata_piix 0000:00:14.0: can't suspend (ata_port_runtime_suspend returned -12)

> +
>  		return error;
> +	}
>  	if (!pci_dev->d3cold_allowed)
>  		pci_dev->no_d3cold = true;
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  9:16 [PATCH] PCI / PM: tune down RPM suspend error message with EBUSY and EAGAIN retval Imre Deak
2015-11-18 10:16 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-18 10:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
2015-11-18 13:28   ` Imre Deak
2015-11-18 14:19     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-27 11:39       ` Jani Nikula
2015-11-27 14:44         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-27 14:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-27 14:56           ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak
2015-11-27 18:17   ` [PATCH v3] " Imre Deak
2015-11-27 22:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-28  8:34     ` [PATCH v4] " Imre Deak
2015-11-30  2:07       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-30 18:07       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-11-30 19:02       ` [PATCH v5] PCI / PM: Tune down retryable runtime suspend error messages Imre Deak
2015-12-02  1:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-02  4:43           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-02  4:43             ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151130180702.GB29242@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.