From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48F29DF5 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:04:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD75AC007 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id hYNjU5wATMsQrbir (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:04:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:04:23 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: XFS corruptions Message-ID: <20151130220423.GA16277@birch.djwong.org> References: <558408F298C8CE4C89D93BD56AB474E8018617B2B3@EXBE1IS02.omnifone.com> <20151130215112.GM26718@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151130215112.GM26718@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Sandeep Patel , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:51:12AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:51:57PM +0000, Sandeep Patel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have multiple 22 disk raid 6 arrays using LSI 9280-24i4e raid > > cards, all using enterprise grade drives. The array is setup with > > physical drive cache disabled and mounted using inode64 with > > nobarriers option in Oracle Linux Server release 6.6, kernel > > version 3.8.13-55.1.5.el6uek.x86_64. We are suffering from > > corruptions with xfs_repair unable to permanently fix the the > > issues. Output of dmesg from the latest corruption. > > > > Pid: 5319, comm: glusterfsd Not tainted 3.8.13-55.1.5.el6uek.x86_64 #2 > > FYI, we cannot really support vendor enterprise on the upstream lists > because the code base is so different from vanilla/upstream kernels. > I same exactly the same thing for bugs reported on RHEL/CentOS > kernels, and for SLES kernels - only the vendor can properly support > their own franken-kernels... > > Hence I'd suggest that you report the problem to your Oracle support > contact so they can walk you through the process of finding the > problem.... > > [ Darrick is really going to thank me for saying this. ] Probably what I'd have written anyway. :) Oracle support might just tell you to upgrade the kernel whatever the latest is. 3.8.13-55 is pretty far back AFAIK. (Is not a support engineer, nor do I play one on TV.) --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs