On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:23:59AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:32:51PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:01:46PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

> > >  #define HDA_MONO 1
> > >  #define HDA_STEREO 2
> > > +#define HDA_QUAD 4

> > Are these defines really helping clarify things?

> hmm, that is a good point :) Since we already had 1, 2 4 seems a logical
> choice. I dont mind either way

I think I'd prefer to just use the numbers, it's not like HDA uses a
different definition of stereo to anything else.