From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759542AbbLCKVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:21:38 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33951 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549AbbLCKVf (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:21:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:21:32 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rling?= Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Mark Brown , Keith Busch , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree Message-ID: <20151203102132.GA15905@lst.de> References: <20151202161936.22b23668cf9dea9872b5079b@kernel.org> <20151202164527.GA31048@lst.de> <565F5D96.5050902@kernel.dk> <565FFFA5.6000003@bjorling.me> <20151203090638.GA14329@lst.de> <566010EE.6050806@bjorling.me> <20151203095726.GA15428@lst.de> <566014BF.3080702@bjorling.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <566014BF.3080702@bjorling.me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: > Similar to this? For the interface yes. Now just get rid of using nvme_ns entirely - seems like you just want ns_id and lba_shift, and those should fit well into nvm_dev I think.