diff for duplicates of <20151203192750.GA19242@cmpxchg.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7a289bb..5dd558d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -8,39 +8,4 @@ On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:27:18PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
 > instead...
 
 You asked the same thing when reviewing the patch for the first
-time. :-) I think it's time to add a comment.
-
->From e8ba3f31bb43ed4091b997b6ee8857dc8bbcd349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:21:45 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop
-
-uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can
-take regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton
-lists where a single page is passed via its page->lru list node.
-
-This can sometimes lead to confusion, as well as suggestions to
-replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.
-
-Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
----
- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
-index 9acfb16..f7ee1c0 100644
---- a/mm/memcontrol.c
-+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
-@@ -5422,6 +5422,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
- 	struct list_head *next;
- 	struct page *page;
- 
-+	/*
-+	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
-+	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
-+	 */
- 	next = page_list->next;
- 	do {
- 		unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
--- 
-2.6.3
\ No newline at end of file
+time. :-) I think it's time to add a comment.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index de8dd07..531e68e 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -39,42 +39,7 @@
   "> instead...\n",
   "\n",
   "You asked the same thing when reviewing the patch for the first\n",
-  "time. :-) I think it's time to add a comment.\n",
-  "\n",
-  ">From e8ba3f31bb43ed4091b997b6ee8857dc8bbcd349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001\n",
-  "From: Johannes Weiner <hannes\@cmpxchg.org>\n",
-  "Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:21:45 -0500\n",
-  "Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop\n",
-  "\n",
-  "uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can\n",
-  "take regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton\n",
-  "lists where a single page is passed via its page->lru list node.\n",
-  "\n",
-  "This can sometimes lead to confusion, as well as suggestions to\n",
-  "replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.\n",
-  "\n",
-  "Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes\@cmpxchg.org>\n",
-  "---\n",
-  " mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++\n",
-  " 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)\n",
-  "\n",
-  "diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c\n",
-  "index 9acfb16..f7ee1c0 100644\n",
-  "--- a/mm/memcontrol.c\n",
-  "+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c\n",
-  "\@\@ -5422,6 +5422,10 \@\@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)\n",
-  " \tstruct list_head *next;\n",
-  " \tstruct page *page;\n",
-  " \n",
-  "+\t/*\n",
-  "+\t * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the\n",
-  "+\t * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().\n",
-  "+\t */\n",
-  " \tnext = page_list->next;\n",
-  " \tdo {\n",
-  " \t\tunsigned int nr_pages = 1;\n",
-  "-- \n",
-  "2.6.3"
+  "time. :-) I think it's time to add a comment."
 ]
 
-6e503c0c57af01da1be8ea3b5fe99e29bd2e145781b4d3140a7fc4d7f88bb4b4
+2eecc3c1789e38e263d4f8ad8091dc57eb013f773504b2a0f53cd3d30f68a79c
