From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755242AbbLDLAy (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:00:54 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:60335 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343AbbLDLAw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:00:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:00:18 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Simon Arlott Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Jonas Gorski Message-ID: <20151204110018.GU26072@sirena.org.uk> References: <20151201221615.GY1929@sirena.org.uk> <20151202125325.GI1929@sirena.org.uk> <565F53FC.5080309@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20151203000631.GM1929@sirena.org.uk> <565FF9E9.1090503@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20151203150528.GG5727@sirena.org.uk> <5660D274.7000402@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20151203234548.GJ5727@sirena.org.uk> <5660D574.7030803@simon.arlott.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ivd6Nf4GAZ12BQqh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5660D574.7030803@simon.arlott.org.uk> X-Cookie: Your domestic life may be harmonious. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.40.249.44 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Ivd6Nf4GAZ12BQqh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:51:16PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote: > On 03/12/15 23:45, Mark Brown wrote: > > Are you *sure* these are regulators and not power domains? These names > > look a lot like they could be power domains. > No, I'm not sure. Some of them are may actually be regulators (the "PHY" > ones) while others are almost definitely power domains (like the "FAP" > Forwarding Assist Processor). OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this. For the things that you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about those? --Ivd6Nf4GAZ12BQqh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYXJBAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ890H/2AUI6DDRwo9IliDDxIXJ5mi 1msdtUuUuBpEP9dKqViHmcOeQrXUmUd5Y/EgtAnPX9kwNXECZGMFPyGKzwYQXbbw a+OeKYc46Jy8TXwzGctxpECMYrkVqp42htbBmMxOsIaygJPPl+1E9BhEKpcf/UdD ik7gFiEeCOnbvRCPk8yUrLR9qi9z6KKPKu62OoOpnlMk/S4h9Cw3NNVMHSaJihb4 RQY1V8jFsByBPXWKCFILplafufAVIDqunuWsPVb++VEUownx6sbBohvtv+IUAm7v vHzbWnvJN+XUz3CXxkZYVvX8id1DeBun0d9nt4kHjJhy5gAnkMZI8gVqvu2M7FQ= =zZVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ivd6Nf4GAZ12BQqh--