From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 11:50:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20151205115007.2230a16a@xeon-e3> References: <1449191574-14629-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <1449191574-14629-3-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20151204032858.GB29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B6AC13A for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:10:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by pfdd184 with SMTP id d184so68556972pfd.3 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:10:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151204032858.GB29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" int error; > > > > @@ -846,58 +845,49 @@ virtio_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) > > if (likely(nb_used > txvq->vq_nentries - txvq->vq_free_thresh)) > > virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, nb_used); > > > > - nb_tx = 0; > > - > > - while (nb_tx < nb_pkts) { > > + for (nb_tx = 0; nb_tx < nb_pkts; nb_tx++) { > > + struct rte_mbuf *txm = tx_pkts[nb_tx]; > > /* Need one more descriptor for virtio header. */ > > - int need = tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1; > > + int need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1; > > While reviewing the code, I found the var name `need' is not properly > taken. Maybe `need_cleanup' is better, and it's better to be defined > as bool type. What do you think of that? The variable need indicates how many more buffers are needed to complete the transmit. In later patches, there is a variable slots so: needed = slots - free So if needed is positive, then more buffers are needed than available and transmit is blocked. If needed is negative then there is free space available. > > (And yes, it has nothing to do with your patch, I just found it we > can rename it to a better name to improve the code readability a bit. > If you agree, would you submit a patch, or should I do it?) > > > > > - /*Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */ > > + /* Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */ > > if (unlikely(need > 0)) { > > nb_used = VIRTQUEUE_NUSED(txvq); > > virtio_rmb(); > > need = RTE_MIN(need, (int)nb_used); > > > > virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, need); > > - need = (int)tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs - > > - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1; > > + need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1; > > + if (unlikely(need > 0)) { > > + PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, > > + "No free tx descriptors to transmit"); > > + break; > > + } > ^ > > Minor nit: I found a leading white space there. Hmm. I didn't see it in checkpatch.