From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add VHOST PMD Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:03:48 +0800 Message-ID: <20151208020348.GH29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1447392031-24970-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <1448355603-21275-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <56662E94.80801@igel.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Tetsuya Mukawa , "Xie, Huawei" Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2780212A8 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:02:52 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56662E94.80801@igel.co.jp> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:12:52AM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > Hi Xie and Yuanhan, > > Please let me make sure whether this patch is differed. > If it is differed, I guess I may need to add ABI breakage notice before Tetsuya, What do you mean by "differed"? Do you mean "delayed"? Per my understanding, it's a bit late for v2.2 (even at few weeks before). On the other hand, I'm still waiting for comments from Huawei, for there are still one or two issues need more discussion. > releasing DPDK-2.2, because the patches changes virtio_net structure. I had sent a patch (which is just applied by Thomas) for reserving some spaces for both virtio_net and vhost_virtqueue structure, so it will not break anything if you simply add few more fields :) --yliu