On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:55:04PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> No backend was setting an error when ending the visit of a list
> or implicit struct.  Make the callers a bit easier to follow by
> making this a part of the contract, and removing the errp
> argument - callers can then unconditionally end an object as
> part of cleanup without having to think about whether a second
> error is dominated by a first, because there is no second error.
> 
> A later patch will then tackle the larger task of splitting
> visit_end_struct(), which can indeed set an error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

For spapr parts:

Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson