From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liviu Dudau Subject: Re: [PATCH 004/182] gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:45:33 +0000 Message-ID: <20151209154533.GO972@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50347 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141AbbLIPpg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:45:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold , Alexandre Courbot , Michael Welling , Markus Pargmann , Anton Vorontsov , arm@kernel.org, Lee Jones , Alexander Shiyan , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Tony Lindgren , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Courbot , Gregory Fong , Brian Norris , Florian Fainelli , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Nicolas Pitre , Olof Johansson , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Rabin Vincent On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both > by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and > for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip > is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several > steps of dereferencing necessary. >=20 > Make things simpler: include the fields directly into > , #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and > get rid of the altogether. Prefix > some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper > kerneldoc while we're at it. >=20 > Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct > gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all > container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and > registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). >=20 > Cc: arm@kernel.org > Cc: Lee Jones > Cc: Alexander Shiyan > Cc: Shawn Guo > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Tony Lindgren > Cc: Kukjin Kim > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > Cc: Gregory Fong > Cc: Brian Norris > Cc: Florian Fainelli > Cc: Liviu Dudau > Cc: Sudeep Holla > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Cc: Nicolas Pitre > Cc: Olof Johansson > Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy > Cc: Rabin Vincent > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ARM SoC folks and Lee: it would be great if you could > ACK the few lines hitting arch/arm/* and drivers/mfd/* in this > so I can take it through the GPIO tree. > --- [....] > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 8 +- [....] > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sys= reg.c > index 3e628df9280c..855c0204f09a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Limited > */ > =20 > -#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_= device *pdev) > { > struct resource *mem; > void __iomem *base; > - struct bgpio_chip *mmc_gpio_chip; > + struct gpio_chip *mmc_gpio_chip; > int master; > u32 dt_hbi; > =20 > @@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_= device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > bgpio_init(mmc_gpio_chip, &pdev->dev, 0x4, base + SYS_MCI, > NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0); > - mmc_gpio_chip->gc.ngpio =3D 2; > - gpiochip_add(&mmc_gpio_chip->gc); > + mmc_gpio_chip->ngpio =3D 2; > + gpiochip_add(mmc_gpio_chip); > =20 > return mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > vexpress_sysreg_cells, [....] > --=20 > 2.4.3 >=20 =46or the drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c part: Acked-by: Liviu Dudau --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- =C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: liviu.dudau@arm.com (Liviu Dudau) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:45:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 004/182] gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct In-Reply-To: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> References: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20151209154533.GO972@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both > by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and > for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip > is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several > steps of dereferencing necessary. > > Make things simpler: include the fields directly into > , #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and > get rid of the altogether. Prefix > some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper > kerneldoc while we're at it. > > Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct > gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all > container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and > registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). > > Cc: arm at kernel.org > Cc: Lee Jones > Cc: Alexander Shiyan > Cc: Shawn Guo > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Tony Lindgren > Cc: Kukjin Kim > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > Cc: Gregory Fong > Cc: Brian Norris > Cc: Florian Fainelli > Cc: Liviu Dudau > Cc: Sudeep Holla > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Cc: Nicolas Pitre > Cc: Olof Johansson > Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy > Cc: Rabin Vincent > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list at broadcom.com > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ARM SoC folks and Lee: it would be great if you could > ACK the few lines hitting arch/arm/* and drivers/mfd/* in this > so I can take it through the GPIO tree. > --- [....] > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 8 +- [....] > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > index 3e628df9280c..855c0204f09a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Limited > */ > > -#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct resource *mem; > void __iomem *base; > - struct bgpio_chip *mmc_gpio_chip; > + struct gpio_chip *mmc_gpio_chip; > int master; > u32 dt_hbi; > > @@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > bgpio_init(mmc_gpio_chip, &pdev->dev, 0x4, base + SYS_MCI, > NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0); > - mmc_gpio_chip->gc.ngpio = 2; > - gpiochip_add(&mmc_gpio_chip->gc); > + mmc_gpio_chip->ngpio = 2; > + gpiochip_add(mmc_gpio_chip); > > return mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > vexpress_sysreg_cells, [....] > -- > 2.4.3 > For the drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c part: Acked-by: Liviu Dudau -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ?\_(?)_/?