From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: Checksum offload queries Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:41:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20151212164137.GG19608@oracle.com> References: <5665A848.9010001@solarflare.com> <20151207.143848.2158761076110518741.davem@davemloft.net> <5666EC4B.40800@solarflare.com> <20151208.120654.2127200076257822677.davem@davemloft.net> <56681B18.3030200@solarflare.com> <566864C0.6020204@solarflare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Edward Cree , Linux Kernel Network Developers , David Miller To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:17765 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbbLLQlw (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:41:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (12/11/15 15:50), Tom Herbert wrote: > layers of encapsulation. For example, suppose send a UDP packet in > VXLAN in VXLAN, where packet looks like: > IP|UDP|VXLAN|Eth|IP|UDP|VXLAN|Eth|IP|UDP. I believe the kernel can set Without detracting from the fact that you have probably found a bug for checksumming here.. if you have multiple encapsulations above (vxlan over vxlan?) I think lot of other things like pmtu may also be broken? (Each encaps layer lowers the actual application mtu till the thing starts to get absurd) --Sowmini