From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753132AbbLNIUG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:20:06 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37510 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752735AbbLNIUC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:20:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:19:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix misleading indentation issues in perf
Message-ID: <20151214081958.GA21686@gmail.com>
References: <20151212180702.GA753@x4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20151212180702.GA753@x4>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:

> perf doesn't build with gcc-6 because of several misleading-indentation
> warnings, e.g.:
> 
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c: In function ‘spawn’:
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c:21:3: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
>    sleep(5);
>    ^~~~~
> 
> arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c:20:2: note: ...this ‘while’ clause, but it is not
>   while(1);
>   ^~~~~

Nice warnings!

> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> index d28c1b6a3b54..fa5d17af88b7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static pid_t spawn(void)
>  	if (pid)
>  		return pid;
>  
> -	while(1);
> +	while(1)
>  		sleep(5);

looks like it caught a real bug here.


>  		case K_UNTAB:
> -			if (nd != NULL)
> +			if (nd != NULL) {
>  				nd = rb_next(nd);
>  				if (nd == NULL)
>  					nd = rb_first(&browser->entries);
> -			else
> +			} else
>  				nd = browser->curr_hot;
>  			break;

That looks like a real bug as well AFAICS.

>  		case K_F1:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index e4b173dec4b9..c900b664ab8f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int perf_pmu__parse_unit(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char *dir, char *n
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -		sret = read(fd, alias->unit, UNIT_MAX_LEN);
> +	sret = read(fd, alias->unit, UNIT_MAX_LEN);
>  	if (sret < 0)
>  		goto error;

This is just whitespace noise, but annoying.

Cool compiler feature.

Thanks,

	Ingo