From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934796AbbLRI7Z (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:25 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:57970 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753300AbbLRI7Y (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:24 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:59:14 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Rethinking sigcontext's xfeatures slightly for PKRU's benefit?
Message-ID: <20151218085914.GA16529@infradead.org>
References: <CALCETrVw2V+Ny7=D=_E2m0Qa_v7Bp8GUjhyDXx_bWC35R2ohjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVw2V+Ny7=D=_E2m0Qa_v7Bp8GUjhyDXx_bWC35R2ohjg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:48:56PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
> 
> I think that, for PKRU in particular, we want the default signal
> handling behavior to be a bit unusual.

Stupid question, but what the heck is PKRU?  A grep of the kernel tree
shows no results, and a web search returns mostly Thai language results.