From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: BGRT doesn't work for me on efi-next Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:56:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20151218125628.GA2638@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <5665E8E0.4050203@moshe.nl> <20151207204451.GC16222@cloud> <56660979.5080204@moshe.nl> <20151207235520.GA17617@cloud> <566623B3.8010104@moshe.nl> <20151208023443.GA10087@x> <56664F79.6060100@moshe.nl> <20151208140529.GH2518@codeblueprint.co.uk> <5667E7B5.3080705@moshe.nl> <5672E335.8000004@moshe.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5672E335.8000004-A/3C56C7qwM@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F4she?= van der Sterre Cc: Sai Praneeth , Josh Triplett , Matthew Garrett , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , Juergen Gross List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org (Pulling in Ingo and Juergen because of commit 954e12f7a800) On Thu, 17 Dec, at 05:30:45PM, M=F4she van der Sterre wrote: > Hello Sai and others, >=20 > The change to use early_mem*() instead of early_io*() in 50a0cb56 doe= s not > work on my machine. Last week I discussed some BGRT changes and I cre= ated a > patch for that, but can't test it on efi-next because of this. >=20 > I get this (when booting 50a0cb56, without any of my changes): > [ 0.026936] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.026941] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/early_ioremap.c:137 > __early_ioremap+0x102/0x1bb() > [ 0.026941] Modules linked in: > [ 0.026944] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0-rc1 #2 > [ 0.026945] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9343/09K8G1, BIOS A05 > 07/14/2015 > [ 0.026946] 0000000000000000 900f03d5a116524d ffffffff81c03e60 > ffffffff813a3fff > [ 0.026948] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81c03e98 ffffffff810a0852 > 00000000d7b76000 > [ 0.026949] 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 > 000000000000017c > [ 0.026951] Call Trace: > [ 0.026955] [] dump_stack+0x44/0x55 > [ 0.026958] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0 > [ 0.026959] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > [ 0.026961] [] __early_ioremap+0x102/0x1bb > [ 0.026962] [] early_memremap+0x13/0x15 > [ 0.026964] [] efi_bgrt_init+0x162/0x1ad > [ 0.026966] [] efi_late_init+0x9/0xb > [ 0.026968] [] start_kernel+0x46f/0x49f > [ 0.026970] [] ? early_idt_handler_array+0x120/= 0x120 > [ 0.026972] [] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0= x2c > [ 0.026974] [] x86_64_start_kernel+0x14a/0x16d > [ 0.026977] ---[ end trace f9b3812eb8e24c58 ]--- > [ 0.026978] efi_bgrt: Ignoring BGRT: failed to map image memory >=20 > This is the second early_memremap call in efi_bgrt_init triggering > WARN_ON(nrpages > NR_FIX_BTMAPS). Can you comment on this? Hmm... yeah NR_FIX_BTMAPS =3D=3D 64, so early_memremap() is limited to mapping ~200KB at once. That's not very big, your BGRT data is likely much larger than that. Obviously we can't use efi_lookup_mapped_addr() any more, so it makes sense to come up with a much robust way to memremap the BGRT image. The immediate solution that comes to mind is using memremap() instead of the early_* version, since the late version won't use the FIXMAP area and will allow us to map a much larger region into the kernel virtual address space. Digging through the history it appears I was the one who made the switch from ioremap() to early_memremap() in commit 081cd62a010f ("x86/efi: Allow mapping BGRT on x86-32"), which I suspect was because a generic memremap() implementation didn't exist at the time. Dan Williams introduced one in Aug 2015 with commit 92281dee825f ("arch: introduce memremap()"). Somewhat surprisingly, Juergen switched the BGRT driver from early_memremap() to early_ioremap() in commit 954e12f7a800 ("x86/mm, efi: Use early_ioremap() in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c") although I can't figure out why because this isn't I/O memory. And now we're attempting to switch it back. Juergen, could you provide a rationale for commit 954e12f7a800? All the commit message says is that it's "an I/O-area", but that isn't true. In the meantime M=F4she, could you try this patch ontop of the EFI 'next' branch? (Note it may not work/compile, but you get the gist) --- diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/e= fi-bgrt.c index bf51f4c02562..b0970661870a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c @@ -72,14 +72,14 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void) return; } =20 - image =3D early_memremap(bgrt_tab->image_address, sizeof(bmp_header))= ; + image =3D memremap(bgrt_tab->image_address, sizeof(bmp_header), MEMRE= MAP_WB); if (!image) { pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: failed to map image header memory\n"); return; } =20 memcpy(&bmp_header, image, sizeof(bmp_header)); - early_memunmap(image, sizeof(bmp_header)); + memunmap(image); bgrt_image_size =3D bmp_header.size; =20 bgrt_image =3D kmalloc(bgrt_image_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void) return; } =20 - image =3D early_memremap(bgrt_tab->image_address, bmp_header.size); + image =3D memremap(bgrt_tab->image_address, bmp_header.size, MEMREMAP= _WB); if (!image) { pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: failed to map image memory\n"); kfree(bgrt_image); @@ -98,5 +98,5 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void) } =20 memcpy(bgrt_image, image, bgrt_image_size); - early_memunmap(image, bmp_header.size); + memunmap(image); }