From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx7d: cl-som-imx7: add basic module support Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:54:13 +0800 Message-ID: <20151221135413.GE18410@tiger> References: <20151208151401.GA20042@rob-hp-laptop> <1449756097-2921-1-git-send-email-grinberg@compulab.co.il> <20151214024315.GC25756@tiger> <56716EA4.2080107@compulab.co.il> <20151221063608.GB4703@tiger> <5677B341.6040203@compulab.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5677B341.6040203-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Igor Grinberg Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Sascha Hauer , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Ilya Ledvich , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:07:29AM +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > >> Do you think we should document it in: > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/compulab-boards.txt > >> (this file should already exist in arm-soc/next/dt)? > > > > Yeah, if the file already exist, it's the best option. But, as it > > doesn't exist on my tree, I can not apply this change. > > It is already in linux-next. > Who do you think should apply the v2 patch then? > May be the arm-soc guys? (Cc'ed Olof and Arnd) I think the best approach here is you leave the change out from the patch, and send that change to arm-soc folks. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:54:13 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx7d: cl-som-imx7: add basic module support In-Reply-To: <5677B341.6040203@compulab.co.il> References: <20151208151401.GA20042@rob-hp-laptop> <1449756097-2921-1-git-send-email-grinberg@compulab.co.il> <20151214024315.GC25756@tiger> <56716EA4.2080107@compulab.co.il> <20151221063608.GB4703@tiger> <5677B341.6040203@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: <20151221135413.GE18410@tiger> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:07:29AM +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > >> Do you think we should document it in: > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/compulab-boards.txt > >> (this file should already exist in arm-soc/next/dt)? > > > > Yeah, if the file already exist, it's the best option. But, as it > > doesn't exist on my tree, I can not apply this change. > > It is already in linux-next. > Who do you think should apply the v2 patch then? > May be the arm-soc guys? (Cc'ed Olof and Arnd) I think the best approach here is you leave the change out from the patch, and send that change to arm-soc folks. Shawn