From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:46:58 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/8 RFC] packages: use TARGET_PATH In-Reply-To: <20151221184436.GB1548@tarshish> References: <20151221184436.GB1548@tarshish> Message-ID: <20151221204658.GD3454@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Baruch, All, On 2015-12-21 20:44 +0200, Baruch Siach spake thusly: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Note that libhid should no longer need that trick, but this woill be > > fixed independently in a follow-up patch. > > So can BR_PATH be removed entirely from top Makefile after this patch? I wondered about that. Still, I think we should keep it, in case we need to update both PATHs with new entries. We could obviously do: TARGET_PATH = $(FOO_CONFIG_DIR):$(HOST_PATH) but that would not fly too far if we need to add dirs to HOST_PATH that should not be in TARGET_PATH. So I prefer to keep BR_PATH (which we could rename as BR_COMMON_PATH). Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'