From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20151227134904.3fd9ecce@xeon-e3> References: <1451011032-83106-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1451011032-83106-3-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Zhihong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812558D93 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:48:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id uo6so78236519pac.1 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:48:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1451011032-83106-3-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 21:37:11 -0500 Zhihong Wang wrote: > Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd. > > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang > --- > examples/l2fwd/main.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/examples/l2fwd/main.c b/examples/l2fwd/main.c > index 720fd5a..75899dd 100644 > --- a/examples/l2fwd/main.c > +++ b/examples/l2fwd/main.c > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -69,6 +71,9 @@ > #include > #include > > +static int force_quit = -1; > +static int signo_quit = -1; These need to be volatile otherwise you risk compiler optimizing away your checks. Also, don't use -1/0 just use 0/1 for boolean or better yet the definition in of bool and true/false. That way the code can read much nicer. > #define RTE_LOGTYPE_L2FWD RTE_LOGTYPE_USER1 > > #define NB_MBUF 8192 > @@ -284,6 +289,8 @@ l2fwd_main_loop(void) > } > > while (1) { > + if (unlikely(force_quit != 0)) > + break; Please maske this a proper while loop instead. while (!force_quit) { > > cur_tsc = rte_rdtsc(); > > @@ -534,6 +541,45 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint8_t port_num, uint32_t port_mask) > } > } > > +static void > +stop_ports(void) > +{ > + unsigned portid, nb_ports; > + > + nb_ports = rte_eth_dev_count(); > + for (portid = 0; portid < nb_ports; portid++) { > + if ((l2fwd_enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0) { > + continue; > + } No need for {} here. > + printf("Stopping port %d...", portid); > + rte_eth_dev_stop(portid); > + rte_eth_dev_close(portid); > + printf(" Done\n"); > + } > +} > + > +static void > +signal_handler(__rte_unused int signum) > +{ > + if (signum == SIGINT || signum == SIGTERM) { signum is used, dont give __rte_unused attribute. > > /* launch per-lcore init on every lcore */ > + force_quit = 0; What is gained by having tri-value here. Just initialize it as false. > rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(l2fwd_launch_one_lcore, NULL, CALL_MASTER); > RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id) { > if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) > return -1; > } > > + printf("Stopping forwarding... Done\n"); > + /* stop ports */ > + stop_ports(); > + printf("Bye...\n"); > + /* inform if there's a caller */ > + if (force_quit != 0) { > + signal(signo_quit, SIG_DFL); > + kill(getpid(), signo_quit); The kill should not be needed. It would be good if examples cleaned up allocations, that way they could be used with valgrind for validation of drivers, etc.