From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1CA7F37 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 06:17:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544E2AC003 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 04:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PMltMAXhjqORWQKd (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 04:17:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 04:17:28 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/76] xfs: implement XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT when rmap btree is enabled Message-ID: <20160103121728.GC28429@infradead.org> References: <20151219085622.12713.88678.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151219090008.12713.25755.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151219090008.12713.25755.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 01:00:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Implement extent swapping when reverse-mapping is enabled. Can you just fold this into the previous patch? There seem to be a lot of patches in the series that would benefit from merging, but this is the one that really screams for it :) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs