From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753535AbcADWw1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:27 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0210.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.210]:38151 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752012AbcADWwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:24 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1568:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3871:5007:6261:6742:7875:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11473:11658:11914:12043:12296:12438:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:14659:21080:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: bit07_891b29613250f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1979 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:20 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , "Rik van Riel" , Tejun Heo , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Christoph Lameter , Viresh Kumar , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andy Lutomirski , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/13] task_isolation: add debug boot flag Message-ID: <20160104175220.310be95c@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1451936091-29247-7-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> References: <1451936091-29247-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> <1451936091-29247-7-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:34:44 -0500 Chris Metcalf wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION > +void task_isolation_debug(int cpu) > +{ > + struct task_struct *p; > + > + if (!task_isolation_possible(cpu)) > + return; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); What's the rcu_read_lock() for? I don't see what is being protected by rcu here? -- Steve > + p = cpu_curr(cpu); > + get_task_struct(p); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + task_isolation_debug_task(cpu, p); > + put_task_struct(p); > +} > +#endif > +