From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933990AbcAKQfE (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:35:04 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:46779 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758890AbcAKQe4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:34:56 -0500 Message-Id: <20160111162458.427203780@infradead.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.61-1 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:24:58 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net, dvyukov@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org, jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: [RFC][PATCH 00/12] various perf fixes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've been hunting perf bugs for the past few weeks. This resulted in this pile of patches, that mostly seems to work -- I still get an occasional fail so something is still off. But I've been sitting on this for far too long, so here goes. (I've not at all tested perf-cgroup) The code compiles in between patches, but I've not bothered trying to run/test any intermediate stage. There's just too many inter-related fail. Alexander, Stephane, could you guys please have a hard look at this? Andi, Dmitry, patch 10 should explain the getting stuck in perf_install_in_context() forever thing you both have observed.