From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] cpufreq: dt: OPP layers handles clock-latency for V1 bindings as well Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:41:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20160112014156.GP22188@codeaurora.org> References: <617c40e84b653fa4253c8f3b2520f27127f87264.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42211 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758859AbcALBl7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:41:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <617c40e84b653fa4253c8f3b2520f27127f87264.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com On 12/22, Viresh Kumar wrote: > "clock-latency" is handled by OPP layer for all bindings and so there is > no need to make special calls for V1 bindings. Use > dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency() for both the cases. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project