From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933830AbcAMKda (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:33:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:36559 "EHLO mail-pf0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933651AbcAMKcz (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:32:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:02:51 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Juri Lelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mturquette@baylibre.com, steve.muckle@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/19] cpufreq: fix warning for show_scaling_available_governors unlocked access to cpufreq_governor_list Message-ID: <20160113103251.GN6050@ubuntu> References: <1452533760-13787-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <1452533760-13787-10-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20160112101315.GA1084@ubuntu> <20160113102536.GB18603@e106622-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160113102536.GB18603@e106622-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13-01-16, 10:25, Juri Lelli wrote: > I couldn't really relate this comment with this patch or the backtrace. > Can you please clarify why you are referring to switching to use > cpufreq-dt here? Yeah, sorry about that. One of your previous patches had backtrace mentioning bL and so I wanted to mention that thing to you. But by that time, I moved to the new patch and thought of just adding the point before forgetting it completely. -- viresh