From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934009AbcAMKsy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:48:54 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33727 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932579AbcAMKsv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:48:51 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:48:47 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Rethinking sigcontext's xfeatures slightly for PKRU's benefit?
Message-ID: <20160113104847.GA11575@gmail.com>
References: <CALCETrVw2V+Ny7=D=_E2m0Qa_v7Bp8GUjhyDXx_bWC35R2ohjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151218085914.GA16529@infradead.org>
 <20151218125753.GF16977@pd.tnic>
 <20160112133820.GA6840@gmail.com>
 <20160112134248.GA2319@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160112134248.GA2319@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:59:14AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Stupid question, but what the heck is PKRU?  A grep of the kernel tree
> > > > shows no results, and a web search returns mostly Thai language results.
> > > 
> > > That should explain it:
> > > 
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151214190542.39C4886D@viggo.jf.intel.com
> > 
> > There's also an LWN article from last year, as background:
> > 
> >   https://lwn.net/Articles/643797/
> 
> I had actually seen both the thread and the article before, but the
> "PKRU" subject didn't really lead to either..

Yeah, stupid vendor acronyms.

Thanks,

	Ingo