From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] PM / OPP: Parse clock-latency and voltage-tolerance for v1 bindings Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:54:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20160115015419.GH22188@codeaurora.org> References: <25cb4d7e9169815448193bd93305fae31a83792c.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:45128 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbcAOByW (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:54:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25cb4d7e9169815448193bd93305fae31a83792c.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com On 12/22, Viresh Kumar wrote: > V2 bindings have better support for clock-latency and voltage-tolerance > and doesn't need special care. To use callbacks, like > dev_pm_opp_get_max_{transition|volt}_latency(), irrespective of the > bindings, the core needs to know clock-latency/voltage-tolerance for the > earlier bindings. > > This patch reads clock-latency/voltage-tolerance from the device node, > irrespective of the bindings (to keep it simple) and use them only for > V1 bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project