From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933606AbcATAwR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:52:17 -0500
Received: from LGEAMRELO11.lge.com ([156.147.23.51]:33948 "EHLO
	lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933016AbcATAvr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:51:47 -0500
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.127
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:51:31 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code
Message-ID: <20160120005131.GC9882@X58A-UD3R>
References: <1452700891-21807-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
 <1452700891-21807-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
 <20160114023050.GB6682@X58A-UD3R>
 <20160119131358.GE6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160119131358.GE6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:30:50AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Lets factorize a bit of code there. We'll even have a third user soon.
> > > While at it, standardize the idle update function name against the
> > > others.
> > 
> > This factorization was one of what I thought it needs to be done! :-)
> 
> I shall interpret this as an Acked-by from you.

Thumb up!